Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 18 '20 at 11:11
Run Duration	273 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Memory 83.9 1-Core 150 2-Core 295 96% 176 Pts	4-Core 569 8-Core 874 89% 721 Pts	64-Core 1,074 66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 377E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.1% Average	Lighting 47.6 Reflection 146 Parallax 124 39% 106 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 47.7 Splatting 62 49% 59.3 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,467 Write 2,003 Mixed 1,620 450% 2,030 MB/s	4K Read 63.6 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 85.3 287% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 1,267 DQ Write 1,133 DQ Mixed 1,195 897% 1,198 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB 24,911 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 33GB free Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 26 44 52 151 146 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 457 Write 356 Mixed 222 SusWrite 105 63% 285 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 39.4 4K Mixed 19.1 79% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 85.9 DQ Mixed 25.9 40% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 56%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 26GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 241 162 139 133 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 448 Write 243 Mixed 222 SusWrite 173 60% 272 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 65.6 4K Mixed 27.7 104% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 87.5 DQ Mixed 126 97% 134 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 86%
Samsung Spinpoint F3R 1TB 778 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 302GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 121 120 121 121 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 93.5 Write 110 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 121 71% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.3 282% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 78%
Samsung Spinpoint F3R 1TB 778 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 163GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 116 Write 31 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 103 59% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 0.9 269% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 78%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 108GB free Firmware: CR100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 47 47 47 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 46.3 Write 53.8 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 46.6 34% 46.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 576GB free Firmware: CR100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 44 43 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 51.7 Write 49.5 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 43.4 34% 45.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	MC Read 38.4 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 37.8 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 25.8 SC Write 23.4 SC Mixed 35.9 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,306x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	835x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	571x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	516x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	405x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	340x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	273x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $933

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16