Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 100% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '20 at 18:25
Run Duration	281 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Memory 83.7 1-Core 151 2-Core 300 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 584 8-Core 929 93% 757 Pts	64-Core 1,081 67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 377E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 152 Parallax 130 116% 141 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 144 Splatting 114 102% 125 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 312GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1715 972 610 623 625 625 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	303% Outstanding	Read 2,534 Write 2,292 Mixed 1,613 SusWrite 862 408% 1,825 MB/s	4K Read 66.8 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 89.8 301% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,298 DQ Write 1,185 DQ Mixed 1,226 924% 1,236 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 303% Great: 340%
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB 24,911 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 5GB free Firmware: UF4500RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 458 Write 311 Mixed 220 73% 330 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 26.1 4K Mixed 19.1 62% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 81.7 DQ Mixed 15.8 34% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 56%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 6GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 488 Write 281 Mixed 229 73% 333 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 25.2 98% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 65.2 DQ Mixed 109 84% 118 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 86%
Samsung Spinpoint F3R 1TB 778 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 327GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 104 104 104 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 79.7 Write 96.9 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 104 61% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 1.4 302% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 78%
Samsung Spinpoint F3R 1TB 778 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 212GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 114 114 115 114 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 99.9 Write 100 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 114 70% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 1 288% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 78%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 108GB free Firmware: CR100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 49 50 51 50 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 50 Write 58.7 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 50.2 36% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 576GB free Firmware: CR100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 50 51 50 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Read 51.8 Write 58.9 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 50 36% 49.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 44%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB 3,976 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 21.7 Mixed 9.2 15% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1.5 86% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	MC Read 38.7 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 38.5 97% 33.8 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 37.5 84% 29.4 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	868x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	402x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $937

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16