Notebook P570WM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook P570WM  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P570WM
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '20 at 04:58
Run Duration409 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 599
62% 500 Pts
64-Core 752
47% 752 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 M290X
Clevo(1558 0270) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
23.6% Poor
Lighting 28.3
Reflection 29
Parallax 40.6
23% 32.7 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 27.4
Splatting 34.3
25% 29.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 27%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Softperfect Virtual Disk 4GB
3GB free
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 5,877
Write 4321
Mixed 4,951
1,123% 5,050 MB/s
4K Read 488
4K Write 405
4K Mixed 437
1,514% 443 MB/s
DQ Read 1,141
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 1,021
765% 1,024 MB/s
Softperfect Virtual Disk 4GB
3GB free
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 6,485
Write 6,038
Mixed 6,066
1,384% 6,196 MB/s
4K Read 497
4K Write 412
4K Mixed 443
1,539% 451 MB/s
DQ Read 1,162
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 1,004
750% 1,003 MB/s
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 195 73 70 77 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 482
Write 472
Mixed 400
SusWrite 157
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 40.4
129% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 250
219% 327 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
241GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 67.2
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 41.4
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 43%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
153GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 20 21 21 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 65
Write 36.3
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 21.6
40% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.4
214% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
33GB free
Firmware: 0706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 20 20 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 37
Write 61.8
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 20.9
35% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.3
168% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 66%
Lacie P9233 8TB
195GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 15 15 15 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 123
Write 88.8
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 15.3
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.6
237% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 15 14 15 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 86.9
Write 86.3
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 14.9
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
190% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 94%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
112GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 25 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 25.7
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 25.9
36% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 49%
OOS4000G 4TB
17GB free, PID 0731
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 28 27 28 26 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.1% Below average
Read 156
Write 121
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 28
114% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
WD Elements 10B8 3TB
229GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.33% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 21.1
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 5.4
22% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.33%
Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
903GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 18 18 17 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 88.4
Write 91.1
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 24.1
75% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 53%
WDC WD10 EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
256GB free, PID 0277
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.5 5.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.4% Very poor
Read 22
Write 22
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 5.5
23% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 21%
WD My Book 500GB
343GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.5 5.4 5.5 5.5 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 22
Write 19.2
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 5.5
21% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 22%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
28GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 15 15 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 76.1
Write 51.7
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 15.4
51% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.3
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 72%
WD 5000AAJS Externa 500GB
373GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 22
Write 21.2
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 5.3
22% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 18%
WD My Book 1130 2TB
2TB free, PID 1130
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.58% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 21
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 5.5
22% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 48%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 1TB
124GB free, PID 0b09
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.4 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.45% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 19.9
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 5.5
21% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.45%
Great: 20%
WDC WD10 EAVS-14D7B1 1TB
292GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.4 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.35% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 19.5
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 5.5
21% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMSX4GX3M1A16 CMSX4GX3M1A16 Samsung M471B1G73QH0- 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.3% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 25.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P570WM Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Notebook P570WM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $205
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback