Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 22:07
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 222
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 718
71% 581 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 114
Parallax 107
85% 108 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 103
83% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 417 402 402 440 429 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 456
Mixed 384
SusWrite 428
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 38.9
127% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 362
263% 344 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 128%
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB
130GB free
Firmware: P0624AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 170 141 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.8% Above average
Read 254
Write 246
Mixed 228
SusWrite 127
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 28.9
93% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 170
117% 143 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
140GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 452 450 450 447 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 460
Mixed 404
SusWrite 450
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 42
141% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 353
243% 302 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C11 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 35.2
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 53.1
75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback