Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 18:52
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 222
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 758
75% 613 Pts
64-Core 881
54% 881 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2177 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.8% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 110
Parallax 91.9
83% 101 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 93.9
Splatting 97.5
80% 97.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 418 427 426 391 421 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 446
Mixed 378
SusWrite 426
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 43.8
141% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 362
266% 350 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB
130GB free
Firmware: P0624AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 165 148 67 67 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.6% Above average
Read 252
Write 180
Mixed 228
SusWrite 127
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 30.4
99% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 124
101% 142 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
140GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 449 441 437 450 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 453
Mixed 402
SusWrite 447
100% 441 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 47.2
151% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 358
246% 303 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C11 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 35.4
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 51.9
77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback