Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 18:38
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 757
75% 612 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2177 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 115
Parallax 110
86% 110 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 102
Splatting 106
86% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 452 477 486 464 320 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 488
Mixed 385
SusWrite 445
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 55
180% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 271
229% 335 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 120%
Great: 128%
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB
130GB free
Firmware: P0624AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 162 151 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.1% Good
Read 153
Write 248
Mixed 236
SusWrite 128
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 40.7
136% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 129
109% 159 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
140GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 478 477 489 489 409 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 482
Mixed 415
SusWrite 468
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 59
197% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 366
263% 335 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C11 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 35.1
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 52.8
76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback