Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	86.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180830
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 14 '20 at 03:50
Run Duration	323 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Memory 92.4 1-Core 136 2-Core 273 92% 167 Pts	4-Core 521 8-Core 863 84% 692 Pts	64-Core 1,134 70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 114 Parallax 107 88% 110 fps	MRender 96.9 Gravity 101 Splatting 101 82% 99.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 251GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 923 637 647 646 649 644 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	291% Outstanding	Read 2,536 Write 2,301 Mixed 1343 SusWrite 691 383% 1,718 MB/s	4K Read 65.7 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 85.9 287% 99.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,354 DQ Write 1,239 DQ Mixed 1,266 958% 1,287 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 291% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 226GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 485 485 486 487 486 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 484 Mixed 408 SusWrite 485 106% 468 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 57.8 193% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 356 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 134%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 39GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 50 51 51 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 51.3 Write 51 Mixed 38 SusWrite 51 35% 47.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 77%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 0GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 34.7 Write 35 Mixed 26.7 41% 32.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 22%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 8GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 36 37 37 36 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	20% Poor	Read 34.5 Write 30.7 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 35.9 42% 31.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 5GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 34.2 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 35.7 40% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB 4,338 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 21GB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 97 101 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 105 Write 91.3 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 96.1 120% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.8 215% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 62%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB 4,338 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 17GB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 96 95 97 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 108 Write 90 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 95.9 122% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 62%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 8GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 0.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 65 Write 66 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 0.1 60% 46.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 43%
WDC WD20 EVDS-63T3B0 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 5GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 88 22 0.1 0.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 65 Write 67 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 48.4 79% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 41%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 58GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 61 80 80 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Read 82.5 Write 83 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 36.9 88% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 43%
WDC WD20 EVDS-63T3B0 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 12GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 89 84 80 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 73.7 Write 74.5 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 85.3 98% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 4x8GB 5,022 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.9% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 24.4 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 24.7 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $259Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,894x
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,734x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,094x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	519x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	486x
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	459x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	385x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	308x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	230x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	209x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	196x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	159x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $891

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359