Panasonic CF-31UB88H1M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPanasonic CF-31UB88H1M  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF31-3
Memory5.8 GB free of 16.0156 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120911
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateMay 13 '20 at 14:38
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594
IC4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 163
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 217
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(10F7 8350) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.951.9.1000
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 2.56
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 6.57
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 300GB-$289
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 143 142 139 123 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 166
Write 174
Mixed 176
SusWrite 140
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 14.6
57% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 69.1
DQ Mixed 69.6
59% 87.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E2 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 64GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback