Panasonic CF-31UB88H1M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemPanasonic CF-31UB88H1M  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF31-3
Memory13.8 GB free of 16.0156 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 23:43
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594
IC4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 179
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 232
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7750M
Device(10F7 8338) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.951.9.1000
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 9.73
Parallax 10.6
6% 9.28 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 7.63
Splatting 12.3
8% 9.31 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF3OA0D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 40 62 63 37 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 27.1
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 42.3
27% 35.3 MB/s
4K Write 0.4
22% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E2 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 64GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback