ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Latitude E7440

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Dell Latitude E7440 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 085VV3
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20151201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '17 at 02:15
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4600U 26,548 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 92.2 2-Core 152 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 222 30% 224 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 05CB) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3574 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	3.9% Terrible	Lighting 4.43 Reflection 6.08 Parallax 6.31 4% 5.61 fps	MRender 7.33 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 6.52 4% 5.35 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.9% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 mSATA 256GB 1,284 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM44D6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1077 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 86 86 507 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 9152 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23530127004 (F2) Unknown 99 99 30380833128	74.7% Very good	Read 505 Write 264 Mixed 273 76% 347 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 60.7 4K Mixed 19 104% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 64.4 DQ Mixed 19.5 54% 122 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 99%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 139 Write 144 Mixed 115 170% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.34 4K Mixed 0.29 92% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 59%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Y9A0 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 298GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 115 Write 92.3 Mixed 99.1 128% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.36 98% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF 2x8GB 1,179 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 16.8 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 18.7 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Latitude E7440 Builds (Compare 1,979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7440

CPU
Core i7-4600UIntelBench 49%, 26,548 samples	788x
Core i5-4310UIntelBench 49%, 14,648 samples	685x
Core i5-4300UIntelBench 44%, 36,631 samples	411x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	1,976x
GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples	1x
HD Graphics FamilyIncredibleBench 3%, 12 samples	1x

SSD
PM851 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 6,648 samples	313x
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples	64x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	49x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	120x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	79x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	72x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback