Powerspec G214

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPowerspec G214  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DP67BG
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '20 at 18:53
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 156
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 394
41% 330 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6790
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 13.2
12% 13.8 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 15.3
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD G3 Series 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.3.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 27 26 31 36 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 61%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 172 164 170 179 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 198
Write 174
Mixed 103
SusWrite 172
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.7
10% 3.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 1.4
2% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 23%
Generic Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 11 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Read 20
Write 9
Mixed 6
SusWrite 11.7
14% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x414436334931433136323445562020202020 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G214 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Powerspec G214

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback