Powerspec G214

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPowerspec G214  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DP67BG
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111120
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateAug 26 '19 at 19:09
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 187
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 464
51% 405 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6790
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 13.2
12% 13.9 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 15.3
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3512G 512GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 340 367 367 369 357 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 299
Write 332
Mixed 198
SusWrite 359
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 33.3
107% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 99.1
DQ Mixed 40.1
38% 57.3 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 119%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 195 196 197 197 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 188
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 196
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x414436334931433136323445562020202020 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G214 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Powerspec G214

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback