Lenovo 3212E4U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 3212E4U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 15:38
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 168
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 342
48% 354 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 61.2
57% 67.6 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 73
58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 92 105 102 108 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 462
Write 106
Mixed 163
SusWrite 102
45% 208 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 13.8
70% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 39.6
69% 140 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 186 193 196 197 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 95
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 184
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 8GB
7GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.7 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 4.8
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 4.4
12% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.6
149% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 0443 RMR1870EC58E9F1333 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3212E4U Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3212E4U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback