Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DVS R3.0  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 15:23
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 696
71% 573 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 12E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 103
Parallax 96.1
88% 102 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 96
Splatting 87.2
84% 105 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 120GB-$82
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 360 358 370 286 263 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 382
Mixed 304
SusWrite 332
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 39.4
159% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 39.2
108% 229 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 100%
Great: 98%
GIGABYTE 240GB
52GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 72 65 92 40 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 495
Write 356
Mixed 361
SusWrite 110
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 34.5
147% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 34.5
88% 181 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 129 128 129 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 160
Write 153
Mixed 109
SusWrite 129
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
88GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 99 97 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 159
Write 101
Mixed 95.9
SusWrite 98.6
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.9% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 25
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DVS R3.0 Builds (Compare 885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback