Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DVS R3.0  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '20 at 15:06
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 703
69% 564 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 12E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 104
Parallax 106
90% 107 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 98
Splatting 85.5
84% 105 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 120GB-$82
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 383 377 368 383 364 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 370
Write 378
Mixed 278
SusWrite 373
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 37.5
156% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 248
203% 288 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 98%
GIGABYTE 240GB
94GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 166 68 68 69 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 497
Write 354
Mixed 331
SusWrite 139
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 32.6
146% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 32.7
84% 173 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 140 142 140 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 133
Write 120
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 140
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
108GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 101 101 101 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 107
Write 106
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 101
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.9% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 25.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DVS R3.0 Builds (Compare 885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback