Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DVS R3.0  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 02:05
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 94.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 255
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 706
71% 577 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 12E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.5% Very good
Lighting 88.9
Reflection 105
Parallax 106
72% 99.7 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 98
Splatting 86.2
84% 106 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 120GB-$82
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 378 359 379 362 345 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 409
Write 378
Mixed 301
SusWrite 352
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 38.7
159% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 39.1
108% 228 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 100%
Great: 98%
GIGABYTE 240GB
165GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 142 101 51 59 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 470
Write 287
Mixed 351
SusWrite 114
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 34.6
147% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 34.2
88% 180 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 139 140 141 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 170
Write 164
Mixed 106
SusWrite 140
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
107GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 97.9
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD0 750GB
63GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 40.6
Write 42.1
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 41.6
50% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 19%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 3.8 3.4 3.4 2.8 3.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
6.64% Terrible
Read 31.1
Write 4.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 3.6
12% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.64%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 25.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DVS R3.0 Builds (Compare 881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback