Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 09:13
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 155
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 466
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 72 69 66 75 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 467
Write 64.8
Mixed 118
SusWrite 76.6
39% 182 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 27.5
105% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 70
75% 130 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 118%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
387GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 129 129 132 131 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 175
Write 151
Mixed 76
SusWrite 129
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87%
Great: 96%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
519GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 134 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 129
Write 125
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 134
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB
99GB free
Firmware: PB2OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 72
Write 69.2
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 79.5
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 45%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB
220GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 36
Write 33
Mixed 29
SusWrite 28.4
42% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 19%
Seagate Backup+ Desk M 160GB
46GB free, PID ab35
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.8% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 26.2
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 36.4
38% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2X1600C8 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback