Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '20 at 13:58
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 79.4 1-Core 75.7 2-Core 114 56% 89.6 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 456 46% 376 Pts	64-Core 444 28% 444 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Lighting 66.7 Reflection 67.3 Parallax 64.6 54% 66.2 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 64.1 Splatting 68.8 55% 67.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 183 120 78 77 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 482 Write 380 Mixed 323 SusWrite 132 73% 330 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 26.8 98% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 57.5 DQ Mixed 122 98% 144 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 118%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 418GB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 120 113 123 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 115 Write 88 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 119 70% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 96%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 541GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 134 125 137 138 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 137 Write 130 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 131 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB 8,875 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 84GB free Firmware: PB2OC60F SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 63 71 71 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 42.2 Write 43.3 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 66.8 32% 44.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 45%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB 161 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 264GB free, PID 1018 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 26 29 29 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 32 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 27.1 41% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 19%
Seagate Backup+ Desk M 160GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 46GB free, PID ab35 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 35 32 36 36 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.4% Very poor	Read 26.8 Write 27 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 34.4 37% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2X1600C8 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 11.9 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 9.7 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	381x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	83x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	30x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	44x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16