Lenovo 90ED001FGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90ED001FGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560x1440x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 14:42
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 144
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 299
36% 279 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3200) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.5% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 37.4
Parallax 33.5
32% 36.6 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 35.6
Splatting 30.7
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 227 186 49 28 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.7% Poor
Read 154
Write 96
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 117
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 7.7
33% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 7.8
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 9.2
7% 10 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST1000DX001-SSHD-8GB 1TB
49GB free
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 176 174 162 163 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 178
Mixed 30
SusWrite 161
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 2
372% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-8GFX 0420 F4-2133C15-8GFX Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90ED001FGE Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90ED001FGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback