Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '17 at 19:52
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 97.4
1-Core 86
2-Core 165
71% 116 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 389
45% 348 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 372.90
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.3% Poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 48
Parallax 42.1
19% 37.9 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 43.8
Splatting 39.6
34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 277GB
213GB free
Firmware: 1.10
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 356
Write 274
Mixed 269
66% 300 MB/s
4K Read 1.53
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 1.45
11% 5.38 MB/s
DQ Read 5.66
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 2.73
4% 7.43 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 35%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$4
194GB free
Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,470
Write 930
Mixed 1,187
265% 1,196 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 53.8
169% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 121
116% 185 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 178%
Great: 219%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,507
Write 1,082
Mixed 1,125
275% 1,238 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 38.2
175% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 106
114% 193 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 189%
Great: 236%
Asrock RAM Disk 3GB
3GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
3TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 186
Mixed 120
129% 174 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.22
96% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 115%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
1TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 161
Mixed 90.3
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.18
86% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136
755GB free
Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 102
Mixed 99.6
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.45
104% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
332GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 82
Write 74.2
Mixed 64
55% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.84
4K Mixed 0.7
233% 2.74 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
60% Above average
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 21.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 15.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 48.9
82% 48.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback