Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '17 at 14:44
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 95.8
1-Core 77
2-Core 150
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 430
44% 356 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 372.90
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Lighting 45.2
Reflection 43
Parallax 41.5
37% 43.2 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 35.3
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 277GB
209GB free
Firmware: 1.10
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 291
Write 207
Mixed 200
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 1.69
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 1.11
11% 5.07 MB/s
DQ Read 5.49
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 3.46
4% 7.61 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 35%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$4
190GB free
Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,326
Write 1,012
Mixed 1,053
251% 1,130 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 47.9
150% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 103
99% 158 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 170%
Great: 219%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,343
Write 976
Mixed 1,015
247% 1,111 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 38.4
164% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 87.9
96% 164 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 172%
Great: 236%
Asrock RAM Disk 3GB
3GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
1TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 157
Write 153
Mixed 102
102% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.19
82% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136
834GB free
Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 97.2
Mixed 83.6
70% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.44
96% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
389GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 81.8
Write 74.3
Mixed 45.5
50% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 6.51
4K Mixed 0.48
202% 2.56 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 75%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
86GB free
Firmware: 04.04V05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 116
Write 118
Mixed 110
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 21.9
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 15
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback