Gigabyte GA-Z87-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87-HD3  (all builds)
Memory14.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140812
Uptime9.5 Days
Run DateMay 05 '20 at 19:44
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 472
61% 462 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 113
Parallax 107
86% 109 fps
MRender 97.6
Gravity 99.5
Splatting 101
82% 99.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 199 50 107 30 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 464
Write 308
Mixed 323
SusWrite 115
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 19.6
122% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 27.4
DQ Mixed 172
116% 145 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 91%
Sandisk S128G 126GB
20GB free
Firmware: 3.1.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 44 28 20 18 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19% Very poor
Read 90.2
Write 87.7
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 34.7
15% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 10.3
42% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 10.6
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 11.4
9% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 19%
Great: 56%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
25GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 74 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66% Good
Read 375
Write 76.3
Mixed 130
SusWrite 75.1
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 37.3
136% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 78.7
DQ Mixed 93.8
71% 95.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
815GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 168 167 169 166 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 155
Mixed 106
SusWrite 167
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
220% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
113GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 99 101 100 99 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 98
Write 59.3
Mixed 32
SusWrite 96.6
52% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.4
131% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
318GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 74 74 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 63.3
Write 71.2
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 74.6
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
298GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 60 58 71 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 62.3
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 61.4
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 0420 F3-10666CL7-2GBXH 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 0420 F3-10666CL7-2GBXH 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87-HD3 Builds (Compare 1,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $153
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback