Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 129% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 149% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	43.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190615
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 03 '20 at 07:17
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 80.5 1-Core 138 2-Core 258 87% 159 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 802 75% 622 Pts	64-Core 2,115 131% 2,115 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2281) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	156% Outstanding	Lighting 214 Reflection 229 Parallax 235 174% 226 fps	MRender 262 Gravity 210 Splatting 138 159% 204 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 943 691 688 682 674 675 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	310% Outstanding	Read 2,624 Write 2,379 Mixed 1,955 SusWrite 726 429% 1,921 MB/s	4K Read 69.7 4K Write 186 4K Mixed 97.8 329% 118 MB/s	DQ Read 1,367 DQ Write 1,263 DQ Mixed 1,306 983% 1,312 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 310% Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 183GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1021 810 815 812 817 819 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	314% Outstanding	Read 2537 Write 1815 Mixed 1,699 SusWrite 849 384% 1,725 MB/s	4K Read 69.6 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 95.7 319% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,419 DQ Write 1,358 DQ Mixed 1,376 1,037% 1,384 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 314% Great: 355%
ORIC0 8628US3-C 3TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 166 164 159 165 165 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 204 Write 167 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 162 201% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 70%
ORIC0 8628US3-C 1TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 767GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 97 96 96 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 104 Write 105 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 96.4 122% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 69%
Patriot Memory 248GB 260 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 62GB free, PID 6000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 17 22 38 18 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 254 Write 128 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 34.1 141% 125 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.5 166% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 86%
ORIC0 8628US3-C 1TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 804GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 63 62 63 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 59.7 Write 62 Mixed 42 SusWrite 62.5 77% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 69%
UCtech 6629US3-C 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 157 158 151 158 157 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	63.4% Good	Read 177 Write 85.5 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 154 157% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 PNY 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 PNY 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K 48GB 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	107% Outstanding	MC Read 42.1 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 39.3 115% 40.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.5 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 36.3 80% 27.9 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $175

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,661x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,291x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,429x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,248x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,084x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,473x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,841x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	868x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	729x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $112Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,000

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16