Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190615
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 07:42
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 236
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 793
73% 613 Pts
64-Core 2,101
130% 2,101 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 227
Parallax 218
175% 220 fps
MRender 266
Gravity 212
Splatting 130
158% 203 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 156%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2045 817 806 809 812 810 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 2,616
Write 2,493
Mixed 1,881
SusWrite 1,016
448% 2,002 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 96.5
324% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,379
DQ Write 1216
DQ Mixed 1,257
954% 1,284 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 325%
Great: 346%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
401GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1908 1020 828 830 831 830 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,380
Write 1746
Mixed 1,605
SusWrite 1041
378% 1,693 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 84
284% 99.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,295
DQ Write 1,246
DQ Mixed 1,252
945% 1,264 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 303%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 PNY 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 PNY 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
106% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 38.9
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 34.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $983
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback