Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5557M APU 571 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	38.1% Below average	Memory 57.8 1-Core 34.7 2-Core 59.4 34% 50.6 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 110 15% 110 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8550G 2,990 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 080E) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	2.85% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 4.96 Parallax 2.62 2% 3.56 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 5.83 4% 4.04 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.85% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 97 16 21 32 39 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.8% Very poor	Read 168 Write 96.3 Mixed 78 SusWrite 67.8 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 6.4 23% 7.9 MB/s	DQ Read 16.6 DQ Write 18.2 DQ Mixed 14.3 12% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Elpida EBJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 800, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.9% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.53 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 5.6 13% 4.63 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-5757M APUAMDBench 44%, 1,325 samples	12x
A8-5557M APUAMDBench 43%, 571 samples	11x

GPU
Radeon HD 8650GAMDBench 5%, 4,043 samples	12x
Radeon HD 8550GAMDBench 3%, 2,990 samples	11x

RAM
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 8GBUnknownBench 27%, 113 samples	5x
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 6GBUnknownBench 24%, 133 samples	4x
HMT451S6MFR8A-PB Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 8GBUnknownBench 27%, 586 samples	4x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38