Acer Aspire V5-552

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-552  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_RL
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 12:02
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5557M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 59.4
34% 50.6 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 110
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
Acer(1025 080E) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 2.62
2% 3.56 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 5.83
4% 4.04 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 97 16 21 32 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.8% Very poor
Read 168
Write 96.3
Mixed 78
SusWrite 67.8
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 6.4
23% 7.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 14.3
12% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Elpida EBJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 8GB
800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.6
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-552 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-552

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback