Packard imedia S3810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPackard imedia S3810  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S3810
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100505
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateApr 30 '20 at 20:25
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 136
57% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 199
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315
Sapphire(174B 1141) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 1.12
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 79 91 38 36 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.2% Poor
Read 206
Write 198
Mixed 132
SusWrite 74.7
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 9.7
43% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 55.7
DQ Mixed 12.4
27% 57.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
523GB free
Firmware: SD3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 67 69 69 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 62.9
Write 29.3
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 68.3
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 2620 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 23 22 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 28.3
Write 17.8
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 23.3
29% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 13.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 0.3
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S3810 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback