TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S1  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130225
Uptime13.1 Days
Run DateApr 30 '20 at 01:54
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 191
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 372
50% 374 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 77.7%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 31.7
28% 30.5 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 31.8
28% 34.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 27.9%
 Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 89 48 2.4 10 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.8% Below average
Read 218
Write 147
Mixed 143
SusWrite 50
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 16
68% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 47
DQ Mixed 24.7
21% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 33.8%
 Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
451GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 121 120 121 121 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 119
Write 118
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 118
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 68.1%
 Great: 69%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
436GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 147 146 148 148 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 145
Write 128
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 144
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 83%
 Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-038.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 49.6%
 Great: 50%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-H61M-S1 Builds (Compare 2,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 - $200

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples252x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples227x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples214x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples454x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples219x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples147x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples211x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples89x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples66x
RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples49x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples48x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples48x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback