Lenovo 81LB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81LB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory15.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180806
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 12:37
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 175
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 554
56% 455 Pts
64-Core 725
45% 725 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39F5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Lighting 7.37
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 7.44
6% 8.47 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 15
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L2 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0L1QEXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1031 303 288 301 301 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 721
Write 1,040
Mixed 694
SusWrite 421
162% 719 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 33.8
150% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 700
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 649
487% 651 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 128%
Great: 241%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: LDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 110 115 103 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 112
Write 113
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 110
71% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 04CB 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.1% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 20.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81LB Builds (Compare 942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 81LB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback