Asus UX32LN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 34% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus UX32LN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX32LN
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 27 '20 at 14:01
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 74%
CPU Throttled 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 43.8
1-Core 21.8
2-Core 37
24% 34.2 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 171
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 15DD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 5.66
3% 4.87 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 2
Splatting 6.78
4% 5.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 324
Write 205
Mixed 263
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 12.4
45% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 31.2
DQ Mixed 21.3
17% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1315 CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.7% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX32LN Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX32LN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback