Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 945 12,746 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 52.7 2-Core 105 53% 82.2 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 209 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 240 45 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(1DA2 E269) ≥ 4GB CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	6.33% Terrible	Lighting 7.9 Reflection 8.54 Parallax 9.88 6% 8.77 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 7.47 Splatting 7.83 6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 46 46 46 47 47 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.4% Average	Read 224 Write 183 Mixed 161 SusWrite 66.9 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 32 107% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 31.1 DQ Write 56.8 DQ Mixed 37.9 30% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 85%
Hitachi HCP725032GLA380 320GB 1,273 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 128GB free Firmware: GM3OA5CA SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 66 67 67 67 68 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 75.4 Write 74.6 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 65.2 48% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 400, 400, 400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.5% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 10.7 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples	4x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	4x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	4x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $621