MSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 09:19
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 945
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 88.3
47% 70.9 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 166
23% 168 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 240
Sapphire(1DA2 E269) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 8.54
Parallax 9.81
6% 8.72 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 7.43
Splatting 7.78
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 48 48 46 49 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.9% Average
Read 217
Write 181
Mixed 163
SusWrite 49.9
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 29.8
100% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 55.1
DQ Mixed 34.9
29% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HCP725032GLA380 320GB
128GB free
Firmware: GM3OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 66 67 69 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 75.5
Write 74.5
Mixed 45
SusWrite 67.2
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 12GB
667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.2% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 770-C45 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $621
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback