Biostar H61MLV2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H61MLV2  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '20 at 17:07
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User HND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 82
2-Core 162
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 301
39% 296 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3450
Dell(1028 0342) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 2.12
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.13 fps
MRender 1.14
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.43
1% 0.91 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 54 81 113 110 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 121
Write 116
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 91.9
70% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
259GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 112 113 113 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
62% Good
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 113
71% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 62%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 14.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MLV2 Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MLV2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback