Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B85M-E  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140220
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '20 at 14:45
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4360-$81
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 139
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 192
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 8509) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.6% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 55.1
46% 57.5 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 53.5
Splatting 47.9
45% 56.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 360 297 300 300 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 400
Mixed 353
SusWrite 306
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 45.2
146% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 346
260% 347 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 134%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
218GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 91 92 91 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 90.8
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1600C10D3/8G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback