HP 700-050

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 700-050  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateApr 22 '20 at 21:26
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 156
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 476
50% 399 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
XFX(1682 3150) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 13
12% 13.2 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.1
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 176 164 166 162 159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 408
Write 326
Mixed 288
SusWrite 181
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 28.5
100% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 148
143% 221 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
827GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 116 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 67
SusWrite 116
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
2TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 114 113 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 127
Write 108
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 113
139% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 0.7
305% 3.13 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 0.5
365% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 KHX1600C10D3/8G Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.2
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-050 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-050

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback