Asus Maximus IV Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110328
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 21 '20 at 22:53
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 514
51% 418 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 41.9
32% 37.8 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 37
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 209 209 207 207 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 443
Write 333
Mixed 356
SusWrite 206
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 36.5
116% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 101
77% 103 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 119%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
821GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1211 832 824 828 831 831 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,175
Write 1,169
Mixed 1,092
SusWrite 892
244% 1,082 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 58.1
197% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 503
DQ Mixed 657
484% 640 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 191%
Great: 276%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$198
2TB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 380 383 380 380 380 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 464
Mixed 405
SusWrite 377
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 40.9
134% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 363
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 122%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
446GB free
Firmware: X412
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 214 213 213 212 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 391
Write 339
Mixed 232
SusWrite 211
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 33.8
103% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 104
79% 104 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 108%
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 256GB
210GB free
Firmware: X231
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 134 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 334
Write 133
Mixed 144
SusWrite 134
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 23.1
82% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 44.6
DQ Write 44.3
DQ Mixed 98.7
59% 62.5 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 95%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
52GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 121
Write 101
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 70.5
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 76%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
48GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 71.5
Write 73
Mixed 80
SusWrite 75.8
56% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991987 (996987) Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 991987 (996987) Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $594
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback