Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 20 '20 at 22:52
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 866
80% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,104
68% 1,104 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.92
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 137
Reflection 129
Parallax 141
112% 136 fps
Gravity 129
Splatting 103
101% 116 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 112%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6471
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 7
Reflection 12
Parallax 8.66
6% 9.22 fps
Gravity 7.63
Splatting 17
12% 12.3 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 475 472 469 457 387 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 474
Mixed 457
SusWrite 456
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 51.6
173% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 350
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Lacie 2big Dock Thunde 20TB
16TB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 376 379 381 380 342 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 340
Write 294
Mixed 155
SusWrite 371
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 2.8
27% 8.83 MB/s
DQ Read 9.4
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 2.2
4% 8.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 48%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 167 167 165 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 118
Write 89.3
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 166
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST8000DM0004-1ZC11G 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 202 199 201 199 197 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.3% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 22.7
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23.6
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback