HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateApr 19 '20 at 23:00
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 168
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 275
35% 265 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 45 44 48 56 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 80
Write 90.2
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 52
47% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
9GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 37 36 43 52 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 26.5
Write 58.5
Mixed 23
SusWrite 45.5
28% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 58%
WD My Passport 0740 1TB
48GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.4 9.5 8.7 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.4% Terrible
Read 28.5
Write 5.2
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 9.5
18% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
45% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.4%
Great: 41%
WD My Passport 071A 500GB
43GB free, PID 071a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.6 9 8.5 11 9.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.76% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 11.5
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 9.5
18% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
55% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.76%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR1870EC58E9F1333 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 RMR1870EC58E9F1333 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 15.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback