Lenovo 3228C55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 3228C55  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120807
Uptime3 Days
Run DateApr 18 '20 at 16:35
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 102
2-Core 153
70% 114 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 508
51% 415 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.4% Very good
Lighting 92.1
Reflection 80
Parallax 76.3
75% 82.8 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 69.2
67% 84.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 167 100 58 75 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.1% Poor
Read 252
Write 230
Mixed 230
SusWrite 98.9
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.5
38% 9.73 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 92%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 84.3
Mixed 66
SusWrite 89.8
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3228C55 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 3228C55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback