Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 80 1-Core 78.6 2-Core 155 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 530 51% 419 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 450.12 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Lighting 68.8 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 64.8 56% 66.7 fps	MRender 71.7 Gravity 65.3 Splatting 57.3 52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 250GB 822 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 253 229 229 217 228 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 531 Write 118 Mixed 149 SusWrite 226 56% 256 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 22.6 86% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 23.6 53% 113 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 265%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 325GB free Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1401 1367 1458 1473 1483 1458 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	209% Outstanding	Read 1,842 Write 1534 Mixed 892 SusWrite 1,440 320% 1,427 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 37.5 120% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 221 166% 222 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 209% Great: 353%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$90 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 75 75 75 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 75.2 Write 69.1 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 74.1 50% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ81RF4EDWD-DJ-F EBJ81RF4ECFD-DJ-F EBJ81RF4EDWD-DJ-F EBJ81RF4EDWD-DJ-F Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 EBJ81RF4ECFD-DJ-F 48GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75% Very good	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 27.8 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.5 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	169x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16