Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateApr 15 '20 at 06:51
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 78.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 299
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1,008
97% 799 Pts
64-Core 1,402
87% 1,402 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.2% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 108
Parallax 102
86% 105 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 94.9
Splatting 97.6
79% 95.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 688 24 13 275 102 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,478
Write 1,576
Mixed 1,053
SusWrite 202
241% 1,077 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 79.7
278% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 898
DQ Mixed 268
342% 600 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 191%
Great: 255%
WD Blue 250GB-$86
64GB free
Firmware: X41000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 164 177 176 177 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 470
Write 226
Mixed 252
SusWrite 180
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 28.2
88% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 187
144% 196 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 100%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
9GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 443
Mixed 389
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 56.4
186% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 165
134% 189 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Garmin Flash 4GB
3GB free, PID 2a36
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.12% Terrible
Read 4
Write 3.7
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 3.4
5% 3.65 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.2
165% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 34.5
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 33
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback