Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '20 at 07:10
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 68.4
1-Core 148
2-Core 290
89% 169 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 904
86% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,362
84% 1,362 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 107
Parallax 91.7
84% 101 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 94.9
Splatting 96.8
78% 95.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 103 105 108 102 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,450
Write 1,559
Mixed 1,072
SusWrite 234
241% 1,079 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 78.4
269% 97.6 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 901
DQ Mixed 265
341% 600 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 190%
Great: 255%
WD Blue 250GB-$86
64GB free
Firmware: X41000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 184 174 164 172 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 479
Write 429
Mixed 350
SusWrite 197
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 30.6
101% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 190
145% 197 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 100%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
9GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 415
Mixed 408
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 52.5
170% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 165
133% 189 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.9% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.5
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 25.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback