PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Biostar TP67B+ (all builds) |
Memory | 9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120706 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 15 '20 at 01:37 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
17.4%
Very poor
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 154 103 30 121 29 MB/s
|
39%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3320413CS 320GB
73GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 81 82 83 82 MB/s
|
43.8%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
129GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 64 64 64 65 MB/s
|
43.2%
Average
|
|||
WD WD3202ABYS-02B7A0 320GB
62GB free
Firmware: 02.03B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 101 100 100 100 MB/s
|
56%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-181.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
41.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 13x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 6x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 3x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $886 |