Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '20 at 21:30
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Memory 82.2 1-Core 145 2-Core 289 93% 172 Pts	4-Core 566 8-Core 816 87% 691 Pts	64-Core 1,042 64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.7% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 115 Parallax 117 94% 116 fps	MRender 173 Gravity 107 Splatting 96.2 99% 125 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 106%
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Palit(1569 13C2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 482 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 17.4 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 16.4 14% 17.1 fps	MRender 22.1 Gravity 15.7 Splatting 19.1 16% 19 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79 10,862 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: X21200RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 496 Write 421 Mixed 227 84% 381 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 96.2 4K Mixed 38.3 151% 56 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 159 166% 273 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 114%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 306GB free Firmware: M0CR011 SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 439 338 321 301 311 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 386 Write 458 Mixed 366 SusWrite 361 89% 393 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 39.4 144% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 354 262% 347 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDT725040VLA360 400GB 1,414 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 16GB free Firmware: V5COA7EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 44 44 45 45 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 55 Write 54.5 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 44.6 34% 46.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 37%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 136 137 136 137 139 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	76% Very good	Read 129 Write 101 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 136 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 96%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 47GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 54 54 55 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 60.3 Write 55.5 Mixed 49 SusWrite 53.8 40% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 55%
Imation Nano 2GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 04a1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.3 4.9 6.2 6.1 6.3 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.49% Terrible	Read 19.7 Write 5.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.9 10% 8.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 78% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.49% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB 15,511 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	MC Read 39.5 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 38.6 98% 34.3 GB/s	SC Read 25.7 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 35.6 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	396x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16