PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 21% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Emaxx EMX-H67M-USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110226 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 09 '20 at 09:12 |
Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
Run User | PHL-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600-$187
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
61.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
|
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 0102) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
1.24%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 142 154 96 168 189 MB/s
|
21%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
159GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 132 131 130 134 133 MB/s
|
85.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
275GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 138 137 139 140 139 MB/s
|
87.1%
Excellent
|
|||
USB 3.0 500GB
230GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 100 101 101 102 MB/s
|
43.5%
Average
|
|||
USB 3.0 500GB
393GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 101 101 101 102 MB/s
|
42.5%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
45.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds