Emaxx EMX-H67M-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardEmaxx EMX-H67M-USB3  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110226
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 09 '20 at 08:51
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$199
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 166
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 415
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 37.8
32% 36.2 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 36.1
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 0102) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.12
1% 1.39 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.35
2% 1.85 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 124 127 129 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.1% Average
Read 174
Write 92
Mixed 138
SusWrite 128
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 28.2
94% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 65.7
DQ Mixed 41.1
33% 45.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
159GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 133 134 134 134 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 163
Write 161
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 132
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
275GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 126 129 129 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 156
Write 156
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 129
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 113%
USB 3.0 500GB
230GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 98 101 100 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 116
Write 105
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 98.5
124% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 214%
USB 3.0 500GB
393GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 99 101 100 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 104
Write 96.7
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 98.6
115% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.2% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback