Gigabyte GA-Z97-HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97-HD3  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150731
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 08 '20 at 02:16
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 235
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 630
65% 523 Pts
64-Core 581
36% 581 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3161) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 64.3
57% 68.7 fps
MRender 74.4
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 56.4
52% 65.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP600 256GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 417
Write 302
Mixed 266
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 46.2
160% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 156
157% 252 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
545GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 156
Write 84.5
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 74.8
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 109%
Micron Crucial X8 SSD 1TB
441GB free, PID 5600
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 32.8
Write 26.8
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 26.9
39% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 7.5
538% 7.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 362%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.1% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97-HD3 Builds (Compare 2,448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97-HD3 - $102

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback