Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GE
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190430
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 11:43
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 42.3
2-Core 58.2
39% 56.6 Pts
4-Core 90.2
8-Core 92.9
12% 91.6 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 18FE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4575
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 26.4
Reflection 8.27
Parallax 25.2
22% 20 fps
MRender 18
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 26.2
16% 18.9 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0922H1S
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 324 364 369 417 425 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 479
Write 403
Mixed 387
SusWrite 337
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 32.9
107% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 62.6
DQ Mixed 1.1
31% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
262GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 72 80 82 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 42.8
Write 70.3
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 75.5
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.3
131% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.1% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 14.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE Builds (Compare 1,510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback