Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GE
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 16:10
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 176
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 668
72% 573 Pts
64-Core 852
53% 852 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 18FE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4575
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 36.4
34% 36.1 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 34.5
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0922H1S
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 382 373 439 431 445 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 442
Mixed 392
SusWrite 407
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 38.3
129% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 233
179% 239 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
259GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 75 70 76 75 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 89
Write 2
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 73.8
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler 120 16GB
8GB free, PID 1623
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.58% Terrible
Read 6
Write 3.2
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 3.3
4% 3.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.58%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.1
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 26.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE Builds (Compare 1,503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback