TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8574
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 00:11
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 204
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 689
70% 566 Pts
64-Core 818
51% 818 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 86.9%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8574) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.5% Good
Lighting 73.8
Reflection 86.2
Parallax 74.2
60% 78 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 69
67% 84.3 fps
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 62.5%
 Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 862 860 859 861 816 823 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,744
Write 2,087
Mixed 1,330
SusWrite 847
338% 1,502 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 59.3
204% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 814
614% 825 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑
This bench: 222%
 Great: 306%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RPM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 167 170 172 171 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 147
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 170
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
226% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 94%
 Great: 95%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
601GB free, PID 2028
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 69 72 71 58 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 67
Write 71.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 65.3
73% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
18% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 24.9%
 Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.1% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 22.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 24.2
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 73.1%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx Builds (Compare 3,421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1,966x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples621x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples523x
GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples1,174x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples940x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples460x
SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples337x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples273x
TOSHIBA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 173%, 3,049 samples193x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples681x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples225x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 8,097 samples175x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback