TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8574
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 20:50
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 258
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 709
70% 573 Pts
64-Core 945
58% 945 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 87.8%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8574) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.8% Good
Lighting 80.9
Reflection 96
Parallax 89.6
66% 88.8 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 73
Splatting 72.3
71% 90 fps
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 67.8%
 Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1985 826 828 834 832 826 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,459
Write 2,268
Mixed 1,274
SusWrite 1,022
340% 1506 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 74.8
244% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 915
689% 923 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑
This bench: 238%
 Great: 306%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RPM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 169 172 172 173 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 137
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 170
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 95.7%
 Great: 95%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
493GB free, PID 2028
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 102 103 102 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 99
Write 98.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 102
107% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 37.6%
 Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 22.8
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 27.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 82%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx Builds (Compare 3,429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1,974x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples621x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples523x
GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples1,176x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples945x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples460x
SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples339x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples274x
TOSHIBA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 173%, 3,049 samples193x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples684x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples226x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 8,097 samples175x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback